This workbench provides practical tools, worked examples, and problem sets for developing Theories of Change that can navigate India's complex development landscape. Each section builds skills through hands-on application.

Workbench Philosophy: Theory without practice is empty; practice without theory is blind. This workbench bridges both through systematic worked examples, comprehensive indicator frameworks, and real-world problem sets drawn from Indian development practice.

Core Concepts Review

Before diving into worked examples, let's establish the foundational concepts that underpin effective Theory of Change development.

The ToC Architecture

ASSUMPTIONSACTIVITIESOUTPUTSOUTCOMESIMPACTS
↑ ↓
CONTEXT ← ← ← ← ← FEEDBACK LOOPS ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ← ←

Critical Distinctions

Theory Failure Implementation Failure
Wrong understanding of change process Poor execution of planned activities
Flawed causal assumptions Resource or capacity constraints
Context misread Management issues
Requires theory revision Requires operational fixes

Fully Worked Examples

WORKED EXAMPLE 1

Financial Inclusion through Women's SHGs in Bihar

Context Analysis

  • Location: Rural Bihar (low state capacity, high poverty)
  • Target: Women from SC/ST communities
  • Problem: Limited access to formal credit, high dependence on moneylenders
  • Existing efforts: NRLM present but limited reach

Initial Simple Theory

Form SHGs → Provide seed capital → Women save and lend → Access to credit → Reduced poverty

Refined Complex Theory with Multiple Pathways

Pathway 1: Economic Empowerment

  • SHG formation → Regular meetings → Savings habit development
  • Group savings → Internal lending → Reduced moneylender dependence
  • Credit history → Bank linkage → Larger loans for productive purposes
  • Productive investment → Income generation → Poverty reduction

Pathway 2: Social Capital

  • Regular meetings → Trust building → Collective action capacity
  • Collective voice → Negotiation with panchayat → Access to schemes
  • Information sharing → Better market linkages → Improved livelihoods

Pathway 3: Women's Agency

  • Financial control → Household bargaining power → Decision-making role
  • Mobility for meetings → Expanded social networks → New opportunities
  • Leadership roles → Confidence → Political participation

Critical Assumptions to Test

  1. Women can attend regular meetings (time, family permission)
  2. Groups can maintain cohesion (no elite capture)
  3. Banks willing to lend to SHGs
  4. Market opportunities exist for investments
  5. Social norms allow women's economic participation

Context-Specific Adaptations for Bihar

  • Caste dynamics: Ensure mixed-caste groups where possible, separate groups where necessary
  • Low literacy: Visual bookkeeping systems, digital financial tools
  • Migration: Flexible meeting schedules, seasonal adjustment
  • Weak banking: Mobile banking partnerships, BC model

Complete Indicator Framework

Output Indicators

Indicator Definition Frequency Source
SHGs formed Number of groups with 10-20 members Monthly MIS
Meeting regularity % groups meeting weekly Monthly Meeting registers
Savings mobilized Average monthly savings per member Monthly Passbooks

Outcome Indicators - Economic

Indicator Definition Target Measurement Method
Credit access % members borrowing from group 80% by Year 1 Loan registers
Moneylender dependence % HH borrowing from informal sources Reduce 50% Household survey
Productive investment % loans used for income generation 60% Loan utilization tracking

Theory-Testing Indicators

Assumption Indicator Red Flag
Women can attend Attendance rate <70%
No elite capture Leadership rotation Same leaders >2 years
Bank linkage possible % groups credit linked <40% by Year 2

Unintended Effects Monitoring

  • Positive: Daughters' education, health-seeking behavior, political participation
  • Negative: Increased domestic conflict, time burden, debt stress
  • Measurement: Quarterly qualitative assessments, household dynamics module
WORKED EXAMPLE 2

Digital Education in Tribal Areas of Jharkhand

Context Analysis

  • Setting: Remote tribal villages, limited connectivity
  • Challenge: Teacher absenteeism, poor learning outcomes
  • Resources: Solar power available, community supportive
  • Language: Hindi medium schools, tribal languages at home

Initial Theory and Its Flaws

Flawed simple theory: Provide tablets → Children access content → Improved learning

Why it fails: Ignores language barriers, teacher capacity, cultural context, infrastructure

Sophisticated Multi-Level Theory

Intervention Levels

INFRASTRUCTURE (Power, devices, maintenance)
+
CONTENT (Culturally relevant, mother tongue)
+
CAPACITY (Teachers, community facilitators)
+
COMMUNITY (Parents, village education committees)

SUSTAINED USAGE → LEARNING IMPROVEMENT

Detailed Causal Pathways

Technology Adoption Pathway:

  1. Solar charging stations → Reliable power → Consistent device availability
  2. Local language content → Comprehension → Engagement
  3. Gamified learning → Motivation → Regular usage
  4. Offline capability → Anytime access → Habit formation

Teacher Integration Pathway:

  1. Teacher training → Digital comfort → Classroom integration
  2. Lesson plans provided → Reduced prep time → Consistent use
  3. Performance data → Targeted support → Better teaching

Community Ownership Pathway:

  1. Parent orientation → Understanding value → Home support
  2. VEC involvement → Local ownership → Sustainability
  3. Youth volunteers → Technical support → Problem solving

Comprehensive Indicator System

Usage and Engagement Indicators

Level Indicator Target Data Source
Individual Average daily usage time 45 minutes App analytics
Individual Content completion rate 70% Learning platform
Classroom Teacher integration frequency 3x per week Observation
School Device functionality rate 90% Monthly audit
Community Parent awareness sessions Quarterly Meeting records

Learning Outcome Indicators

Domain Indicator Measurement Frequency
Literacy Reading fluency (grade-appropriate) Words per minute Quarterly
Numeracy Problem-solving ability Standardized assessment Bi-annual
Digital Skills Independent navigation Task completion test Quarterly
Conceptual Science concept understanding Practical demonstrations Term-end

Assumption Testing Protocol

  1. Infrastructure reliability: Weekly functionality checks, repair time tracking
  2. Content relevance: Student feedback sessions, usage pattern analysis
  3. Teacher buy-in: Monthly surveys, classroom observations
  4. Community support: VEC meeting attendance, volunteer participation

Risk Mitigation Strategies

  • Technical: Local repair training, spare parts inventory
  • Social: Address gender access issues, flexible timing
  • Pedagogical: Blended approach, not replacing teachers
  • Sustainability: Government partnership, community contribution model

Indicator Development Deep Dive

Effective indicators are the nervous system of your Theory of Change—they help you sense what's working, what's not, and what's changing in unexpected ways.

Indicator Typology and Purpose

Implementation Fidelity

Are we doing what we planned? Tracks adherence to design and quality of delivery.

Theory Testing

Are our assumptions holding? Tests causal links and mechanisms.

Context Monitoring

What's changing around us? Tracks external factors affecting outcomes.

Outcome Tracking

What changes are occurring? Measures intended results at various levels.

Unintended Effects

What else is happening? Captures positive and negative spillovers.

Equity Analysis

Who benefits and who doesn't? Disaggregates impacts across groups.

SMART-ER Indicators for Complex Contexts

Traditional SMART criteria (Specific, Measurable, Achievable, Relevant, Time-bound) need enhancement for development contexts:

Criterion Standard Definition Enhanced for Development
Specific Clearly defined + Culturally interpreted consistently
Measurable Quantifiable + Feasible with local capacity
Achievable Realistic targets + Accounts for system constraints
Relevant Aligned to objectives + Meaningful to communities
Time-bound Has deadline + Appropriate to change process
Ethical Does no harm in measurement
Responsive Adapts to emerging insights
INDICATOR DEVELOPMENT EXAMPLE

Women's Empowerment in Agriculture Program

Moving from Vague to Precise Indicators

Vague: "Women are empowered"

Better: "Women make agricultural decisions"

Precise: "% of women who report independent or joint decision-making on crop selection, input purchase, and produce sale"

Comprehensive: "Decision-making index combining:

  • Crop selection (sole or joint)
  • Input purchases over ₹1000
  • Sale timing and price negotiation
  • Income use from agriculture"

Building a Complete Indicator Framework

Multi-Level Indicator System

Level Domain Indicator Data Source Frequency
Individual Knowledge % women knowing 3+ improved practices Knowledge test Baseline, Annual
Practice Adoption rate of improved techniques Farm observation Seasonal
Agency Self-efficacy score (validated scale) Survey Annual
Household Economic Women's control over ag income (%) HH survey Annual
Social Spousal consultation frequency Couple interviews Annual
Time use Hours in productive vs domestic work Time diary Seasonal
Community Norms Acceptance of women farmers (%) Community survey Baseline, Endline
Institutional Women in farmer groups leadership Group records Annual
Market Access Women directly selling to markets Market survey Seasonal
Recognition Traders accepting women as suppliers Trader interviews Annual

Indicator Quality Assurance

Indicator Development Checklist

Definition is unambiguous and consistently understood
Measurement method is feasible with available resources
Disaggregation plan specified (gender, caste, age, etc.)
Baseline data available or plan to collect
Target is evidence-based, not arbitrary
Data collection doesn't create perverse incentives
Indicator captures meaningful change, not just activity

Common Indicator Pitfalls and Solutions

Pitfall Example Solution
Activity focus "Number of trainings conducted" Track skill application instead
Single dimension "Income increased" Include income control, stability
Gaming risk "Enrollment numbers" Add quality and retention metrics
Elite bias "Average improvement" Track bottom quintile separately
Time mismatch Annual targets for slow change Use intermediate process indicators

Problem Sets for Practice

PROBLEM SET 1
FOUNDATIONAL

Theory vs Implementation Analysis

Scenario A: School Infrastructure Program

A program built toilets in 100 schools across rural Rajasthan. After one year:

  • 95% of toilets were constructed to specification
  • 80% had running water connections
  • Only 40% were being regularly used
  • Girl attendance improved in only 25% of schools

Questions:

  1. Diagnose whether this is primarily theory or implementation failure
  2. What additional data would confirm your diagnosis?
  3. Design a study to test whether infrastructure → attendance link is valid
  4. Propose theory modifications based on findings
SOLUTION APPROACH

Diagnosis: Primarily theory failure. Implementation was largely successful (95% built, 80% functional) but behavioral change didn't follow.

Additional data needed: Reasons for non-use, cultural factors, maintenance systems, complementary interventions in successful schools.

Study design: Compare high-use vs low-use schools, controlling for infrastructure quality, to identify additional necessary conditions.

PROBLEM SET 2
INTERMEDIATE

Causal Pathway Mapping

Scenario B: Agricultural Extension via Mobile Phones

Design a Theory of Change for delivering agricultural advisory through mobile phones to smallholder farmers in Andhra Pradesh.

Context provided:

  • 70% farmers have basic phones, 30% smartphones
  • Literacy rate: 67%, digital literacy: 15%
  • Major crops: Cotton, groundnut, chili
  • Key challenges: Pest management, market prices, weather

Tasks:

  1. Map at least 4 distinct causal pathways
  2. Identify critical assumptions for each pathway
  3. Design pathway-specific indicators
  4. Anticipate 3 potential negative consequences
  5. Propose risk mitigation strategies
SOLUTION FRAMEWORK

Pathway 1: Information → Better decisions → Yield improvement

Pathway 2: Price alerts → Market timing → Income increase

Pathway 3: Peer networks → Knowledge sharing → Innovation adoption

Pathway 4: Digital records → Credit history → Formal finance access

Key risks: Exclusion of non-phone owners, information overload, dependency creation

PROBLEM SET 3
ADVANCED

Complex Systems ToC Development

Scenario C: Urban Slum Upgrading in Mumbai

Develop a comprehensive Theory of Change for a slum upgrading program that aims to improve living conditions through:

  • Infrastructure improvements (water, sanitation, electricity)
  • Land tenure security
  • Community organization strengthening
  • Livelihood support

Complexity factors:

  • Multiple government agencies involved
  • Informal power structures
  • Mixed ownership patterns
  • Diverse communities (linguistic, religious)
  • High mobility and migration

Requirements:

  1. Develop integrated ToC showing component interactions
  2. Map feedback loops and potential system responses
  3. Create tiered indicator system (output → outcome → impact)
  4. Design adaptive management triggers
  5. Specify contribution vs attribution approach
  6. Address equity across different groups
SOLUTION ELEMENTS

Core insight: Physical upgrading without tenure security may trigger gentrification. Community organization is prerequisite for sustained benefits.

Key feedback loops: Improved conditions → Land value increase → Displacement pressure → Need for stronger tenure protection

Adaptive triggers: If displacement >10%, pivot to tenure focus. If elite capture detected, strengthen accountability mechanisms.

PROBLEM SET 4
INDICATOR DEVELOPMENT

Comprehensive Indicator Design

Scenario D: Adolescent Life Skills Program

Design a complete indicator framework for a program teaching life skills to adolescents (ages 14-18) in government schools in Uttar Pradesh.

Program components:

  • Critical thinking and problem solving
  • Communication and interpersonal skills
  • Gender sensitivity and equality
  • Career guidance and goal setting
  • Health and wellness awareness

Develop indicators for:

  1. Implementation quality (process)
  2. Skill acquisition (immediate outcome)
  3. Skill application (intermediate outcome)
  4. Life trajectory changes (long-term impact)
  5. Gender differential effects
  6. Unintended consequences

Additional requirements:

  • Specify measurement methods feasible in school settings
  • Include both quantitative and qualitative indicators
  • Design for attribution challenges (other influences on adolescents)
  • Create practical data collection timeline

Measurement Design in Practice

Moving from indicators to measurement systems requires careful attention to methodology, feasibility, and use.

Measurement Approach Selection

Approach When to Use Strengths Limitations
RCT Testing specific mechanisms, high stakes Strong causal inference Expensive, ethical constraints
Quasi-experimental When randomization impossible Balances rigor and feasibility Selection bias risks
Contribution analysis Complex interventions, multiple actors Handles complexity well Less definitive causation
Developmental evaluation Innovative, adaptive programs Supports learning and adaptation Less summative judgment
Mixed methods Understanding how and why Rich insights Resource intensive
MEASUREMENT DESIGN EXAMPLE

WASH Program in Rural Schools

Measurement Challenge

Assessing impact of water, sanitation, and hygiene interventions on health and education outcomes in 200 schools across 5 districts.

Integrated Measurement Design

1. Baseline Design (Months 1-3)

  • School infrastructure audit
  • Student health assessment (random sample)
  • Attendance records (previous year)
  • WASH knowledge test
  • Observation of practices

2. Process Monitoring (Ongoing)

  • Monthly: Functionality checks, soap availability
  • Quarterly: Practice observations, student focus groups
  • Per term: Teacher interviews, attendance analysis

3. Outcome Measurement (Annual)

  • Health: Diarrhea incidence, respiratory infections
  • Education: Attendance rates, especially girls
  • Behavior: Handwashing at critical times
  • Knowledge: Hygiene awareness scores

4. Comparison Strategy

  • Matched comparison schools (similar characteristics)
  • Difference-in-differences analysis
  • Within-school pre-post comparison

5. Data Quality Assurance

  • 10% random re-verification
  • Triangulation across sources
  • Community validation meetings
  • Digital data collection with validation rules

Building Adaptive Theories of Change

Static theories fail in dynamic contexts. Adaptive ToCs build in learning loops and triggers for strategic adjustment.

Adaptation Triggers and Responses

Early Warning Indicators and Responses

Warning Sign Threshold Investigation Potential Response
Low participation <60% target Barrier analysis Adjust timing, location, incentives
Elite capture signals Leadership concentration Power mapping Strengthen accountability
Theory breakdown Assumption violations Causal analysis Revise pathways
Context shift External changes Stakeholder consultation Strategic pivot
Unintended harm Any evidence Immediate assessment Modify or halt
ADAPTATION EXAMPLE

COVID-19 Response in Education Programs

Original Theory: In-person teaching → Learning improvement → Better life outcomes

Context Shock: School closures, digital divide exposed

Rapid Adaptation Process:

  1. Week 1-2: Assess household technology access
  2. Week 3-4: Design multi-modal delivery (radio, SMS, WhatsApp)
  3. Month 2: Deploy community learning facilitators
  4. Month 3: Create parent engagement materials
  5. Ongoing: Track engagement across channels

New Pathways Added:

  • Parent as educator support → Home learning environment
  • Peer learning groups → Social distance learning
  • Digital content → Self-paced progress

Lessons for Adaptive Design:

  • Build flexibility into implementation contracts
  • Maintain reserves for pivoting
  • Regular assumption testing
  • Strong feedback systems

Sector-Specific Theory of Change Guidance

Each development sector has unique dynamics, stakeholders, and change processes. This section provides detailed guidance for building ToCs across major sectors.

Gender Equality and Social Inclusion

Core Challenge: Gender change operates at multiple levels simultaneously—individual consciousness, household dynamics, community norms, and institutional practices. ToCs must address all levels for sustainable change.
GENDER TOC EXAMPLE

Preventing Gender-Based Violence in Urban Slums

Multi-Level Change Architecture

Individual Level:

  • Women: Safety planning skills → Reduced vulnerability
  • Men: Gender sensitization → Changed attitudes → Reduced perpetration
  • Youth: Early intervention → Healthy relationship norms

Community Level:

  • Community watch groups → Rapid response → Deterrence
  • Male champions → Peer influence → Norm shifting
  • Women's collectives → Collective action → System pressure

Institutional Level:

  • Police sensitization → Better response → Justice access
  • Health system preparedness → Survivor support
  • Local governance engagement → Policy implementation

Critical Gender ToC Principles

  1. Power Analysis: Map formal and informal power structures
  2. Backlash Anticipation: Plan for resistance to changing gender norms
  3. Intersectionality: Consider caste, class, religion interactions
  4. Men's Engagement: Design specific pathways for male involvement
  5. Safety First: Ensure interventions don't increase risk

Gender-Sensitive Indicators

Domain Quantitative Qualitative
Agency Decision-making index score Narratives of choice expansion
Safety Reported incidents (with safe reporting) Perception of safety changes
Norms Attitude survey scores Community discourse analysis
Institutional Response time and quality Survivor experience stories

Women's Economic Empowerment (WEE)

WEE Complexity: Economic empowerment without addressing unpaid care work, mobility restrictions, and asset control often fails. WEE ToCs must tackle structural barriers alongside skill building.
WEE PATHWAY ANALYSIS

Textile Sector Women Workers in Tamil Nadu

Standard Theory (Often Fails):
Skills training → Better jobs → Higher income → Empowerment

Complex Reality-Based Theory:

WEE Systems Change Model

INDIVIDUAL CAPACITY (Skills, confidence, networks)
+
HOUSEHOLD NEGOTIATION (Reduced care burden, mobility freedom)
+
MARKET SYSTEMS (Gender-inclusive workplaces, equal pay)
+
SOCIAL NORMS (Acceptance of women workers)
+
INSTITUTIONAL SUPPORT (Childcare, transport, safety)

SUSTAINABLE ECONOMIC EMPOWERMENT

WEE-Specific Indicators

  • Economic: Income level AND control over income
  • Time use: Paid work hours AND unpaid care work distribution
  • Asset ownership: Name on documents, decision rights
  • Business: Registration status, profit retention
  • Financial inclusion: Account ownership AND active usage

Livelihoods

LIVELIHOODS TOC FRAMEWORK

Farm to Non-Farm Transition in Rural Odisha

Context Factors

  • Declining agricultural viability (small holdings, climate stress)
  • Youth aspiration for non-farm work
  • Limited local opportunities
  • Skill mismatch with market demand

Multi-Pathway Approach

Pathway 1: Local Enterprise Development

  • Value chain analysis → Opportunity identification
  • Entrepreneurship training → Business plan development
  • Credit linkage + mentoring → Enterprise establishment
  • Market connection → Sustainable income

Pathway 2: Skilled Employment

  • Market scan → Demand-driven skill selection
  • Quality training + certification → Employability
  • Placement support + migration support → Job access
  • Workplace retention support → Career growth

Pathway 3: Collective Enterprises

  • Producer group formation → Economies of scale
  • Collective infrastructure → Reduced costs
  • Brand development → Premium markets
  • Profit sharing mechanisms → Equitable benefits

Critical Success Factors for Livelihood ToCs

  1. Market Reality: Base on actual demand, not assumptions
  2. Ecosystem Approach: Address skills, capital, markets, and mentoring
  3. Safety Nets: Include fallback options during transition
  4. Household Economics: Consider full income portfolio
  5. Migration Support: Don't ignore mobility as strategy

Public Health

Health System Complexity: Health outcomes result from interaction between health systems, individual behaviors, social determinants, and environmental factors. Single-factor interventions rarely succeed.
PUBLIC HEALTH TOC

Reducing Maternal Mortality in High-Burden Districts

Three Delays Framework Application

Delay 1: Decision to Seek Care

  • Community awareness → Danger sign recognition
  • Male involvement → Family support for care-seeking
  • Financial planning → Reduced cost barriers

Delay 2: Reaching Health Facility

  • Transport systems → Accessible referral
  • Communication (108/102) → Timely ambulance
  • Birth preparedness → Advance arrangements

Delay 3: Receiving Quality Care

  • Facility readiness → 24/7 EmOC availability
  • Staff competence → Clinical quality
  • Respectful care → Positive experience → Future utilization

Public Health ToC Essentials

Component Common Mistake Better Approach
Behavior Change Information = behavior Address barriers, enable environment
Service Delivery Infrastructure = access Quality, dignity, cultural competence
Community Health CHW training sufficient Support systems, supplies, respect
Health Equity Same intervention for all Targeted approaches for vulnerable

Education

EDUCATION SYSTEMS TOC

Foundational Learning Improvement in Government Schools

The Learning Crisis Causal Web

Education Quality Framework

INPUTS
Teachers (present, capable, motivated)
Materials (textbooks, TLM)
Infrastructure (classrooms, toilets)

PROCESSES
Teaching practices (child-centered, level-appropriate)
Time on task (academic focus)
Assessment and feedback

INTERMEDIATE OUTCOMES
Student engagement
Regular attendance
Concept mastery

LEARNING OUTCOMES
Foundational literacy/numeracy
Higher-order thinking
Socio-emotional skills

Critical Education ToC Elements

  1. Teacher Agency: Not just training but ongoing support
  2. System Alignment: Curriculum, assessment, and pedagogy coherence
  3. Parent Engagement: Beyond enrollment to learning support
  4. Equity Focus: First-generation learners need different support
  5. Language: Mother tongue instruction in early years

Learning-Focused Indicators

Level Process Outcome
Classroom % time on active learning Student engagement score
Student Attendance rate Grade-appropriate learning
Teacher Pedagogical practice score Student progress rate
System Support visit frequency School improvement index

Climate Resilience

Climate ToC Challenge: Must balance immediate adaptation needs with long-term resilience building while addressing underlying vulnerabilities that climate change exacerbates.
CLIMATE RESILIENCE TOC

Drought-Resilient Agriculture in Marathwada

Nested Resilience Pathways

Immediate Coping (0-1 year):

  • Drought-tolerant varieties → Yield stability
  • Water conservation → Extended growing period
  • Crop insurance → Loss protection

Adaptation (1-5 years):

  • Cropping pattern shift → Reduced water dependence
  • Soil health improvement → Better water retention
  • Collective water management → Aquifer recharge
  • Alternative livelihoods → Income diversification

Transformation (5+ years):

  • Landscape restoration → Ecosystem services
  • Climate-smart value chains → Market premiums
  • Youth engagement → Innovation adoption
  • Policy influence → Enabling environment

Climate ToC Specifics

  • Multi-scale: Farm, watershed, landscape levels
  • Science integration: Climate projections inform design
  • Traditional knowledge: Blend with modern practices
  • Gender dimensions: Women's specific vulnerabilities
  • Maladaptation risks: Avoid short-term fixes that increase long-term vulnerability

WASH/Water and Sanitation

WASH SYSTEMS TOC

Urban Sanitation in Small Towns

Service Chain Approach

Containment:

  • Toilet access → Safe containment technology → Proper construction
  • Behavior change → Consistent usage → Health benefits

Emptying and Transport:

  • Service provider capacity → Regular emptying → No overflow
  • Affordable pricing → Willingness to pay → Sustainable service

Treatment:

  • Treatment infrastructure → Proper processing → Environmental protection
  • O&M systems → Continuous operation → Consistent quality

Reuse/Disposal:

  • Safe disposal protocols → Implementation → No contamination
  • Resource recovery → Revenue generation → System sustainability

WASH ToC Critical Elements

  1. Whole system view: Infrastructure alone never sufficient
  2. Behavior centrality: Technology + behavior = outcomes
  3. Institutional arrangements: Who maintains, who pays?
  4. Equity lens: Reaching poorest, disabled, elderly
  5. Sustainability planning: Beyond project period

WASH Service Level Indicators

Service Access Quality Sustainability
Water Households within 500m Meets quality standards Functional 95% of time
Sanitation Household toilet ownership Safely managed Regular emptying when full
Hygiene Handwashing facility Soap + water present Observed practice

ARSH/Sexual and Reproductive Health and Rights

SRHR Sensitivity: SRHR ToCs must navigate cultural taboos, power dynamics, and rights-based approaches while ensuring safety and confidentiality for vulnerable populations.
ARSH TOC EXAMPLE

Comprehensive Adolescent Health Program

Multi-Component Integration

Information and Awareness:

  • Age-appropriate CSE → Knowledge → Informed decisions
  • Peer educators → Trusted sources → Norm shifting
  • Digital platforms → Private access → Stigma reduction

Service Access:

  • Adolescent-friendly clinics → Confidential services → Utilization
  • Provider training → Non-judgmental care → Return visits
  • Outreach services → Reaching marginalized → Equity

Enabling Environment:

  • Parent sensitization → Family support → Open communication
  • Teacher training → School-based support → Early intervention
  • Community dialogue → Norm change → Reduced stigma

Rights and Agency:

  • Life skills education → Negotiation skills → Safer behaviors
  • Gender equality focus → Power balance → Consensual relations
  • Legal literacy → Rights awareness → Protection seeking

ARSH-Specific Considerations

  • Segmentation: Different approaches for in-school/out-of-school, married/unmarried
  • Confidentiality: Absolute requirement for trust and access
  • Provider attitudes: Major barrier requiring intensive work
  • Male engagement: Often neglected but critical
  • Violence prevention: Integrated GBV response

ARSH Outcome Tracking

Domain Indicator Measurement Challenge
Knowledge SRH knowledge score Social desirability bias
Service use Contraceptive prevalence Privacy concerns
Agency Decision-making autonomy Cultural interpretation
Safety Violence experience Disclosure barriers

Unsolved Problem Sets

These problems reflect real challenges faced by development practitioners. Work through them to build your ToC development skills. No solutions are provided—compare your approaches with colleagues and adapt based on context.

UNSOLVED PROBLEM 1
COMPLEX SYSTEMS

Urban Informal Settlements Upgrading

Context:

You're designing a comprehensive program for informal settlement upgrading in Bengaluru affecting 50,000 residents across 5 settlements. The program has four components:

  • Infrastructure: Water, sanitation, electricity, roads
  • Housing: In-situ upgradation support
  • Livelihoods: Skills and enterprise development
  • Governance: Community organizations and municipal interface

Complications:

  • 60% residents are tenants, not owners
  • Multiple competing community organizations exist
  • High daily wage earners can't afford work disruption
  • Previous efforts led to gentrification and displacement
  • Municipal corporation has limited implementation capacity
  • Land ownership is contested in 3 settlements

Your Tasks:

  1. Develop integrated ToC showing component interactions and feedback loops
  2. Identify minimum 5 critical assumptions that could derail the program
  3. Design safeguards against gentrification and displacement
  4. Create indicator framework that captures both intended benefits and potential harms
  5. Develop adaptive management protocol for emerging challenges
  6. Specify how you'll ensure tenant benefits alongside owners
UNSOLVED PROBLEM 2
MEASUREMENT CHALLENGE

Measuring Women's Empowerment in Conservative Contexts

Scenario:

You're evaluating a women's economic empowerment program in rural Rajasthan where:

  • Direct questions about decision-making may not yield honest responses
  • Women's mobility is severely restricted
  • Male family members often present during surveys
  • Economic gains might be appropriated by male family members
  • Increased income could lead to reduced food allocation for women

Program Components:

  • Skill training in traditional crafts with market linkages
  • Group savings and credit
  • Leadership development
  • Male sensitization sessions

Design Challenge:

  1. Develop creative measurement approaches that work around cultural constraints
  2. Design proxy indicators for empowerment that can be observed/verified
  3. Create data collection protocols ensuring women's safety and privacy
  4. Develop methods to detect potential negative consequences
  5. Build in validation approaches for self-reported data
  6. Design participatory evaluation methods appropriate for low-literacy contexts
UNSOLVED PROBLEM 3
THEORY DEVELOPMENT

Digital Health in Tribal Areas

Context:

Develop a ToC for telemedicine services in tribal areas of Chhattisgarh where:

  • Internet connectivity is sporadic (2G when available)
  • Nearest PHC is 20-40 km away
  • Traditional healers are primary health providers
  • Language barriers exist (tribal languages, limited Hindi)
  • High malnutrition and communicable disease burden
  • Trust in outside systems is low

Available Resources:

  • ASHA workers with basic smartphones
  • Solar charging stations in some villages
  • District hospital with specialist doctors
  • Partnerships possible with local NGOs

Develop:

  1. Realistic pathways from telemedicine to health outcomes
  2. Integration approach with traditional healing systems
  3. Technology design specifications based on constraints
  4. Trust-building mechanisms
  5. Sustainability model post-project funding
  6. Quality assurance system for remote consultations
UNSOLVED PROBLEM 4
MULTI-STAKEHOLDER

School-to-Work Transition for Youth with Disabilities

Challenge:

Design a ToC for improving employment outcomes for youth with disabilities (YWD) in urban India, addressing:

  • Multiple disability types (physical, intellectual, sensory)
  • Employer prejudices and workplace accessibility
  • Family overprotection or shame
  • Inadequate skill training infrastructure
  • Policy implementation gaps despite legal mandates
  • Intersectional challenges (gender, caste, poverty)

Stakeholders Include:

  • Youth with disabilities and their families
  • Special educators and mainstream schools
  • Vocational training providers
  • Employers (formal and informal sector)
  • Disability rights organizations
  • Government departments (education, labor, social justice)

Your ToC Must Address:

  1. Different pathways for different disability types and severity
  2. Demand-side (employer) and supply-side (YWD skills) interventions
  3. Family engagement strategies that shift from protection to empowerment
  4. Reasonable accommodation approaches for resource-constrained employers
  5. Peer support and role model mechanisms
  6. Metrics that capture quality of employment, not just placement
UNSOLVED PROBLEM 5
BEHAVIORAL COMPLEXITY

Reducing Child Marriage in High-Prevalence Districts

Context:

Design intervention for districts where 40%+ girls married before 18, considering:

  • Economic drivers (dowry reduction for younger brides)
  • Safety concerns (harassment, "family honor")
  • Limited higher education access
  • Intergenerational norm transmission
  • Weak law enforcement
  • Girls' limited agency in decisions

Failed Previous Approaches:

  • Legal awareness campaigns (knowledge didn't change practice)
  • Conditional cash transfers (families found workarounds)
  • School retention programs (didn't address root causes)

Design Requirements:

  1. Move beyond single-factor theories to address complex causation
  2. Account for why families who "know better" still practice child marriage
  3. Design for different archetypes (economic necessity vs. social norm vs. safety concern)
  4. Include pathways for norm shift, not just individual behavior change
  5. Address potential backlash and underground practices
  6. Create indicators capturing process changes before outcome changes
UNSOLVED PROBLEM 6
CLIMATE ADAPTATION

Coastal Community Resilience in Sundarbans

Multiple Stressors:

  • Sea level rise and land loss
  • Increased cyclone intensity
  • Salinity intrusion affecting agriculture
  • Mangrove degradation
  • Out-migration of working-age men
  • Human-wildlife conflict (tigers)

Current Coping Strategies:

  • Seasonal migration for work
  • Shift to salinity-tolerant crops (limited success)
  • Aquaculture (creating new vulnerabilities)
  • Informal early warning systems

ToC Development Challenge:

  1. Design interventions for "trapped populations" who can't migrate
  2. Balance immediate survival with long-term sustainability
  3. Address cascading risks (climate → economic → social → climate)
  4. Include traditional knowledge while incorporating climate science
  5. Create pathways for transformation, not just coping
  6. Design for uncertainty—interventions robust across climate scenarios
  7. Address loss and damage, not just adaptation
UNSOLVED PROBLEM 7
INSTITUTIONAL CHANGE

Improving Quality of Care in Public Health Facilities

Systemic Issues:

  • Chronic understaffing and absenteeism
  • Demotivated providers (low pay, poor conditions)
  • Stock-outs of essential supplies
  • Informal payments despite free services
  • Poor infrastructure maintenance
  • Lack of accountability mechanisms
  • Political interference in transfers/postings

Patient Context:

  • Low expectations of public services
  • Limited ability to demand quality
  • Preference for private providers despite cost
  • Emergency care seeking only when critical

Design Comprehensive ToC Addressing:

  1. Provider motivation beyond monetary incentives
  2. Community accountability mechanisms that actually work
  3. System changes vs. individual behavior changes
  4. Political economy of health system reform
  5. Patient empowerment in hierarchical contexts
  6. Sustainable improvements vs. project-period gains
  7. Measurement systems that capture care quality, not just utilization
UNSOLVED PROBLEM 8
CROSS-SECTORAL

Nutrition-Sensitive Agriculture

The Challenge:

Design ToC linking agricultural interventions to nutritional outcomes for tribal households in Jharkhand where:

  • Rice mono-cropping dominates despite low nutritional diversity
  • Kitchen gardens failed due to water scarcity and open grazing
  • Market vegetables unaffordable and unavailable
  • Traditional nutritious foods abandoned as "backward"
  • Women's agricultural work increased but control over produce limited
  • PDS provides calories but limited dietary diversity

Required Integration:

  1. Agriculture practices that improve nutrition, not just income
  2. Behavior change addressing food preferences and intra-household allocation
  3. Market systems ensuring availability and affordability
  4. Women's time burden and care practices
  5. Seasonal hunger periods and coping strategies
  6. Links with health systems for nutrition services
  7. Indicators capturing dietary diversity, not just production

Tools and Templates

ToC Development Process Checklist

Context Analysis: Institutional mapping, stakeholder analysis, problem diagnosis
Theory Construction: Pathway mapping, assumption articulation, risk identification
Indicator Development: Multi-level framework, measurement feasibility, baseline planning
Learning Agenda: Key uncertainties, research questions, adaptation triggers
Stakeholder Validation: Beneficiary input, expert review, implementer buy-in
Documentation: Visual diagrams, narrative explanation, evidence base

ToC Quality Scoring Rubric

LOGIC (25%) - Causal chains clear and evidence-based
CONTEXT (25%) - Local factors thoroughly considered
COMPLEXITY (20%) - Feedback loops and systems mapped
MEASUREMENT (20%) - Indicators test theory effectively
ADAPTIVENESS (10%) - Learning mechanisms embedded

Score each dimension 1-5, multiply by weight, sum for total
Final Reminder: The best Theory of Change is not the most sophisticated one, but the one that accurately represents how change happens in your specific context and provides clear guidance for action and learning. Use these tools to build ToCs that serve your program's success, not theoretical elegance.